The following disk analysis has been sorted by the average percent of time the disk was busy.

The disk device hdisk6 was busy an average of 25.73 percent of the time and had an average queue length of 1.3 (when occupied). This indicates that the device is not a performance bottleneck. During the peak interval from 11:20:00 to 11:25:00, the disk was 93.0 percent busy.

The disk device hdisk7 was busy an average of 24.61 percent of the time and had an average queue length of 1.8 (when occupied). This indicates that the device is not a performance bottleneck. During the peak interval from 14:50:00 to 14:55:00, the disk was 94.0 percent busy.

The disk device hdisk2 was busy an average of 22.26 percent of the time and had an average queue length of 1.8 (when occupied). This indicates that the device is not a performance bottleneck. During the peak interval the disk was 98.0 percent busy.

The disk device hdisk10 was busy an average of 11.19 percent of the time and had an average queue length of 0.9 (when occupied). This indicates that the device is not a performance bottleneck. During the peak interval from 14:45:00 to 14:50:00, the disk was 98.0 percent busy.

The disk device hdisk3 was busy an average of 7.37 percent of the time and had an average queue length of 0.5 (when occupied). This indicates that the device is not a performance bottleneck. During the peak interval from 14:15:00 to 14:20:00, the disk was 56.0 percent busy. Peak disk busy statistics can be used to help understand performance problems. If performance was worst when the disk was busiest, then a performance bottleneck may be that disk.