The disk device hdisk5 was busy an average of 20.30 percent of the time and had an average queue length of 0.0 (when occupied). This indicates that the device is not a performance bottleneck.

The disk device hdisk0 was busy an average of 7.30 percent of the time and had an average queue length of 0.5 (when occupied). This indicates that the device is not a performance bottleneck.

The disk device hdisk2 was busy an average of 2.30 percent of the time and had an average queue length of 0.0 (when occupied). This indicates that the device is not a performance bottleneck.

The disk device hdisk4 was busy an average of 2.20 percent of the time and had an average queue length of 0.1 (when occupied). This indicates that the device is not a performance bottleneck.

The disk device hdisk6 was busy an average of 0.00 percent of the time and had an average queue length of 0.0 (when occupied). This indicates that the device is not a performance bottleneck.

The disk device hdisk1 was busy an average of 0.00 percent of the time and had an average queue length of 0.0 (when occupied). This indicates that the device is not a performance bottleneck.

The disk device hdisk3 was busy an average of 0.00 percent of the time and had an average queue length of 0.0 (when occupied). This indicates that the device is not a performance bottleneck.

The disk device hdisk7 was busy an average of 0.00 percent of the time and had an average queue length of 0.0 (when occupied). This indicates that the device is not a performance bottleneck.