SarCheck(TM): Automated Analysis of HP-UX sar and ps data 
    (English text version 5.00.00) 

    This is an analysis of the data contained in the file /tmp/rpt.  The 
    data was collected on 05/02/2002, from 08:00:00 to 17:00:00, from the 
    HP9000/785/C360 system 'hippie'.  There were 108 data records used to 
    produce this analysis.  The operating system used to produce the sar 
    report was HP-UX Release B.11.00.  1 processor is present.  64 megabytes 
    of memory are present.  

    Data collected by the ps -elf command on 05/02/2002 from 08:00:00 to 
    17:00:00, and stored in the file /usr/local/ps/20020502, will also be 
    analyzed.  

    SUMMARY 

    When the data was collected, no CPU bottleneck could be detected.  A 
    memory bottleneck was seen.  No significant I/O bottleneck was seen.  A 
    change to at least one tunable parameter has been recommended.  

    Some of the defaults used by SarCheck's rules have been overridden using 
    the sarcheck_parms file.  See the Custom Settings section of the report 
    for more information.  

    RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION 

    All recommendations contained in this report are based solely on the 
    conditions which were present when the performance data was collected.  
    It is possible that conditions which were not present at that time may 
    cause some of these recommendations to result in worse performance.  To 
    minimize this risk, analyze data from several different days, implement 
    only regularly occurring recommendations, and implement them one at a 
    time.  

    Additional memory may improve performance.  If possible, borrow some 
    memory for test purposes, and monitor system performance and resource 
    utilization before and after its installation.  

    Change 'bufpages' from 0 to 3276.  SarCheck has determined that this 
    value should result in a more efficient use of the system's memory.  

    No disk recommendations have been made because no bottleneck was seen.  

    It may be possible to reduce memory utilization by reducing the 
    parameter 'maxdsiz'.  This parameter defines the maximum data segment 
    size, and a smaller value will prevent users from taking up as much 
    memory.  The optimum value of this parameter is application dependent 
    and experimentation is required.  

    Use the System Administration Manager (SAM) to change the values of 
    tunable parameters.  More information on the SAM utility and relinking 
    the kernel is available in the System Administration Tasks manual.  

    RESOURCE ANALYSIS SECTION 

    Average CPU utilization was only 0.2 percent.  This indicates that spare 
    CPU capacity exists.  If any performance problems were seen during the 
    entire monitoring period, they were not caused by a lack of CPU power.  

    The CPU was waiting for I/O an average of 1.0 percent of the time.  This 
    statistic does not indicate the presence of an I/O bottleneck.  The time 
    that the system was waiting for I/O peaked at 20 percent from 08:10:01 
    to 08:15:02.  

    The CPU was idle (neither busy nor waiting for I/O) and had nothing to 
    do an average of 98.8 percent of the time.  If overall performance was 
    good, this means that on average, the CPU was lightly loaded.  If 
    performance was generally unacceptable, the bottleneck may have been 
    caused by remote file I/O which cannot be directly measured with sar and 
    therefore cannot be considered by SarCheck.  

    The run queue had an average depth of 1.0 which indicates that processes 
    were generally not bound by latent demand for CPU resources.  

    The syncer daemon used 0.009 percent of the CPU from 08:00:00 to 
    17:00:00.  The syncer is responsible for writing data from the buffer 
    cache to disk.  It's activity indicates that it is not so active as to 
    cause a problem.  

    This system's buffer cache is dynamic, meaning that its size is 
    determined by the amount of free memory on the system.  Buffer cache 
    data indicates that increasing the size of dbc_max_pct would probably 
    not be effective because memory pressure would prevent the buffer cache 
    from growing much beyond the value specified by dbc_min_pct.  Based on 
    the current values of dbc_min_pct and dbc_max_pct, the buffer cache can 
    range in size from 12.8 to 25.6 megabytes of memory.  

    At least one indication of a memory shortage was seen in the following 
    statistics: Data collected with ps -elf shows that the sched daemon used 
    5 seconds of CPU time.  This indicates a possible memory shortage.  Data 
    collected with ps -elf shows that the vhand daemon used 10 seconds of 
    CPU time.  This indicates a possible memory shortage, which is confirmed 
    by other statistics related to memory utilization.  The swap out rate 
    peaked at 1.07 per second from 10:40:00 to 10:45:01.  Peak resource 
    utilization statistics can be used to help understand performance 
    problems.  If performance was worst during the period of peak swap out 
    activity, then a performance bottleneck may be a memory shortage.  

    The minimum number of free pages of memory seen was 79.  The value of 
    lotsfree was 535 pages and the maximum value of gpgslim seen was 308 
    pages.  The value of desfree was 133.  If the minimum number of free 
    pages drops below the value of desfree, the system should benefit from 
    additional memory.  

    The fs_async flag is not set.  This may result in reduced disk 
    performance, but keeps filesystem data structures consistent in the 
    event of a system crash.  This option is currently in the state 
    recommended for production systems.  Since no disk I/O bottleneck was 
    seen on this system, setting the fs_async flag would be unlikely to 
    provide enough of an improvement to justify the additional risk.  

    No unusual configurable parameter values were seen in those parameters 
    which relate to the process accounting system.  The current values of 
    acctsuspend and acctresume are unlikely to have an impact on system 
    performance.  

    The inode cache did not overflow, but was completely full in 0.9 percent 
    of the samples collected during the monitoring period.  With UNIX 
    operating systems such as HP-UX which use the inode table as a cache, 
    this indicates that the inode cache may actually be somewhat larger than 
    necessary.  

    The process and open file tables were less than 80.0 percent full.  Peak 
    table usage statistics (max used/table size) as reported by sar: Process 
    table: 72/276.  Open file table: 290/920.  

    The file table, controlled by the nfile parameter, was much larger than 
    necessary.  There is nothing to gain by reducing the size of this table, 
    so no change to the parameter 'nfile' is recommended.  

    No System V semaphore activity was seen.  No problems have been seen, 
    and no changes have been recommended for System V semaphore parameters.  
    Note that SarCheck only checks these parameter's relationships to each 
    other since semaphore usage data is not available.  Algorithms used by 
    SarCheck to check these relationships are available in the help text of 
    SAM.  

    No System V message activity was seen.  No problems have been seen, and 
    no changes have been recommended for System V message parameters.  Note 
    that SarCheck only checks these parameter's relationships to each other 
    since message usage data is not available.  Algorithms used by SarCheck 
    to check these relationships are available in the help text of SAM, and 
    in the file /usr/include/sys/msg.h.  

    The ratio of exec to fork system calls was 0.97.  This indicates that 
    PATH variables are efficient.  

    The disk device c0t6d0 was busy an average of 1.31 percent of the time 
    and had an average queue depth of 3.2 (when occupied).  This usage 
    pattern is typical of that generated by sync activity.  Sync activity 
    refers to efforts made by the sync process to transfer data from the 
    system buffer cache to disk.  The average service time reported for this 
    device and its accompanying disk subsystem was 16.9 milliseconds.  This 
    is somewhat slow for a modern disk drive, and the disappointing 
    performance may be due to the disk or its controller.  Service time is 
    the delay between the time a request was sent to a device and the time 
    that the device signaled completion of the request.  

    At 08:15:02 ps -elf data indicated that there were 69 processes present.  
    This was the largest number of processes seen with ps -elf but it is not 
    likely to be the absolute peak because the operating system does not 
    store the true "high-water mark" for this statistic.  

    No runaway processes, memory leaks, or suspiciously large processes were 
    detected in the data contained in file /usr/local/ps/20020502.  

    CAPACITY PLANNING SECTION 

    This section is designed to provide the user with a rudimentary linear 
    capacity planning model and should be used for rough approximations 
    only.  These estimates assume that an increase in workload will affect 
    the usage of all resources equally.  These estimates should be used on 
    days when the load is heaviest to determine approximately how much spare 
    capacity remains at peak times.  

    WARNING: Data in this section may be inaccurate because the length of 
    the average sampling interval was only 5.00 minutes.  When the interval 
    is less than 10 minutes, peak statistics are likely to underestimate the 
    remaining amount of CPU or disk capacity.  

    Based on the limited data available in this single sar report, the 
    system should be able to support a very limited increase in workload at 
    peak times before the first resource bottleneck affects performance.  
    See the following paragraphs for additional information.  

    The CPU can support an increase in workload of at least 100 percent at 
    peak times.  Since page outs and/or swapping were detected, an increase 
    in workload should be accompanied by an increase in memory.  The busiest 
    disk can support a workload increase of at least 100 percent at peak 
    times.  For more information on peak CPU and disk utilization, refer to 
    the Resource Analysis section of this report.  

    All system tables measured by sar -v can hold at least twice as many 
    entries as were seen.  

    CUSTOM SETTINGS SECTION 

    The default MAXCPU threshold was changed in the sarcheck_parms file from 
    95.0 to 88.0 percent.  

    The gnuplot graph directory specified in the sarcheck_parms file with 
    the GRAPHDIR keyword was /tmp.  

    ERROR: An attempt to change the AVGRQ threshold failed because the new 
    value was out of bounds.  An attempt to change the MAXRQ threshold 
    failed because the new value was out of bounds.  

    Please note: In no event can Aptitune Corporation be held responsible 
    for any damages, including incidental or consequent damages, in 
    connection with or arising out of the use or inability to use this 
    software.  All trademarks belong to their respective owners.  Evaluation 
    copy for: Your Company.  This software expires on 06/05/2002 
    (mm/dd/yyyy).  SC9000 Code version: 5.00.00.  Serial number: 00055555.  

    Thank you for trying this evaluation copy of SarCheck.  To order a 
    licensed version of this software, just type 'analyze9000 -o' at the 
    prompt to produce the order form, and follow the instructions.  

    (c) copyright 1995-2002 by Aptitune Corporation, Plaistow NH, USA, All 
    Rights Reserved.  http://www.sarcheck.com 

    Statistics for system, hippie 
    System model number is, 9000/785/C360 
    Statistics collected on, 05/02/2002 
    Average CPU utilization, 0.2% 
    Peak CPU utilization, 4% 
    Average user CPU utilization, 0.2% 
    Average sys CPU utilization, 0.0% 
    Average waiting for I/O, 1.0% 
    Average run queue depth, 1.0 
    Peak run queue depth, 1.3 
    Average swap queue occupancy, 0.1% 
    Average swap out rate, 0.44/sec 
    Average cache read hit ratio, 98.5% 
    Average cache write hit ratio, 64.7% 
    Disk device w/highest peak, c0t6d0 
    Avg pct busy for that disk, 1.31% 
    Peak pct busy for that disk, 22.13% 
    Max number of processes seen by ps, 69 
    Percent of process tbl used, 26.1% 
    Process table overflows, No 
    Percent of file table used, 31.5% 
    File table overflows, No 
    Inode cache pct of time full, 0.9% 
    Inode cache overflows, No 
    Approx CPU capacity remaining, 100%+ 
    Approx I/O bandwidth remaining, 100%+ 
    Remaining process tbl capacity, 100%+ 
    Remaining file table capacity, 100%+ 
    Can memory support add'l load, No